2017 vs 2016 model year

General discussion of the BMW R1200RT/R1250RT
Post Reply
jdkerner
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 3:46 am

2017 vs 2016 model year

Post by jdkerner »

I'm looking to get a 1200rt and found a new 2016.  I could save at least 1k by purchasing this instead of a '17, but I know there are some differences (lean angle ABS, for one).
I know not much about BMW bikes.  I currently own Harleys and Ducatis, so I'd like the opinion of those with experience.  Thanks!
guest2360

Re: 2017 vs 2016 model year

Post by guest2360 »

That is not a lot of difference in price between models a year apart. 
There are conflicting opinions here on the improvements between the two but on the whole the 17 is better in the transmission department with a smoother gearbox .
If I had the choice it would be the 17 as it's  resale value down the line I'll be better.
steve.sharkey
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:10 am

Re: 2017 vs 2016 model year

Post by steve.sharkey »

I have a 2014, no lean angle stuff for abs. Not missed it but then never plan to hit the brakes once leaned over either.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LAF
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 11:33 pm

Re: 2017 vs 2016 model year

Post by LAF »

jdkerner wrote: I'm looking to get a 1200rt and found a new 2016.  I could save at least 1k by purchasing this instead of a '17, but I know there are some differences (lean angle ABS, for one).
I know not much about BMW bikes.  I currently own Harleys and Ducatis, so I'd like the opinion of those with experience.  Thanks!
1 K difference is a no brainer take the 17.

Seems off only 1K difference. 

Guys were getting 4-5k off and Nav V on 16's over here on this side of the pond.

If not a hardship go the 17.
User avatar
richardbd
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 8:40 pm
Been liked: 2 times

Re: 2017 vs 2016 model year

Post by richardbd »

steve.sharkey wrote: I have a 2014, no lean angle stuff for abs. Not missed it but then never plan to hit the brakes once leaned over either.

Nobody ever PLANS to hit the brakes when they're leaned over!


;)



steve.sharkey
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:10 am

Re: 2017 vs 2016 model year

Post by steve.sharkey »

Indeed!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Taz
Posts: 106
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 4:50 pm

Re: 2017 vs 2016 model year

Post by Taz »

I would push for a better deal. I bought a 2016 bike from a UK dealer that was 6 months old and with 1,500 miles on it.  I saved over £4,000 compared to new and I know of others who got a similar deal.
So when is this “old enough to know better” supposed to kick in?
steve.sharkey
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:10 am

Re: 2017 vs 2016 model year

Post by steve.sharkey »

And I thought I got a good deal!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Attackpug
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:22 am

Re: 2017 vs 2016 model year

Post by Attackpug »

Love my 16
Attachments
Mybeemer.jpg
TJRL
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2015 1:00 pm
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 2 times
United States of America

Re: 2017 vs 2016 model year

Post by TJRL »

steve.sharkey wrote: And I thought I got a good deal!
So did the dealer (and he was right!!!).  :))
2020 R1250RT, 2021 Triton ST-125, 1960 SII Land Rover.
steve.sharkey
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:10 am

Re: 2017 vs 2016 model year

Post by steve.sharkey »

Always is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post Reply